The Digital Native Myth: Untangling Prensky and Kirschner's Perspectives

In the digital age, our relationship with technology continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, shaping the way we think, learn, and interact. Two prominent voices in this discourse are Marc Prensky and Paul A. Kirschner. Prensky's work explores the transformative impact of technology on students' cognitive processes, while Kirschner challenges some of Prensky's assertions, particularly around the concept of digital literacy. I wanted to dive into how students' thinking patterns have changed and unravel the myths surrounding digital natives.

Changing Thinking Patterns: Prensky's Perspective

Marc Prensky's influential 2001 article Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants posits that the influx of digital technology has fundamentally altered the way young people think and process information. He highlights several key shifts

Nonlinear Thinking: Digital natives often navigate information non-linearly, thanks to their constant interaction with the internet. Unlike traditional linear learning methods, they hop from YouTube to Wikipedia to then back to YouTube stitching together knowledge from diverse sources in a web-like manner.

Multitasking: The digital environment has conditioned students to juggle multiple tasks simultaneously. It's not uncommon for a student to watch a lecture while at the same time writing notes on another tab showcasing an ability to switch between tasks rapidly.

Visual Preference: The visual nature of digital content has also shifted preferences. Students are more inclined towards videos, infographics, and interactive media over traditional text-heavy materials. The success of visually driven platforms like TikTok underscores this trend on social media.

Desire for Instant Gratification: The immediacy of digital interactions has fostered a preference for quick rewards. This can be seen in the popularity of gamified learning environments that offer instant feedback, as opposed to traditional, slower-paced educational methods. for example, sending an email to get your paper peer review then having to do it in person in class with the classmate watching you mark their mistakes.

Kirschner's Critique: His Dispelling Myths of Digital Literacy

While Prensky's observations offer valuable insights, Paul A. Kirschner raises important critiques about the assumptions underlying the digital native narrative. One of the primary myths he addresses is the belief that being a digital native equates to being digitally literate.

Kirschner argues that familiarity with technology doesn't necessarily translate to digital literacy. Being digitally literate requires more than just the ability to use digital devices; it encompasses critical skills such as evaluating the credibility of online information, understanding data privacy, and recognizing the ethical implications of digital actions. For example, many students may easily navigate social media platforms but struggle with more complex tasks like discerning credible sources from misinformation or protecting their personal data online. Kirschner's critique underscores the need for comprehensive digital education that goes beyond basic tech usage, aiming to cultivate a true digital literacy.

Bridging the Gap: Implications for Education

Both Prensky's and Kirschner's perspectives highlight crucial aspects of the digital transformation in education. Prensky's observations about the changing cognitive patterns of students underscore the need for educational approaches that cater to their new ways of thinking. On the other hand, Kirschner's critique reminds us that access to technology alone isn't enough. But Educators must focus on teaching critical digital skills to help students navigate the digital landscape effectively and responsibly.

I found a 2 TED talks videos the first one is about digital literacy and how to use it to Succeed in Learning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgEGbMPJcAo and the second one is about Digital natives vs. digital immigrants and which one employer prefer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_9gI0B4nS4&t=30s

In conclusion, I think understanding the interplay between digital nativeness and digital literacy is essential for developing educational strategies that meet the needs of modern learners. By acknowledging the shifts in thinking patterns and addressing the myths of digital literacy, we can better equip students to thrive in an increasingly digital world.

Sources: 

Kirschner, Paul A., and Pedro De Bruyckere. “The Myths of the Digital Native and the Multitasker.” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 67, no. 67, Oct. 2017, pp. 135–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001.

Prensky, Marc. The Emerging Online Life of the Digital Native: What They Do Differently because of Technology, and How They Do It. 2004.

https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

‌

‌